|Posted on April 1, 2012 at 3:30 PM|
We’ve all been in that concert with a multi-movement work and after the exciting first movement ends, the audience erupts into applause… for a second. Then they realize that was wrong and stop doing that.
There are 2 ways that people handle this situation. The first (and most prevalent), the performers sit there quietly, ignoring the applause until they stop. If they don’t stop quick enough, one or two of them turn to the audience, give a half smile and a quick nod and turn back to the music/instrument.
The second way, is that one person (usually the conductor) makes some sort of shooshing gesture that looks something like this:
Before I give my controversial opinion on the subject, I’m going to discuss why I don’t like either option. The second, is obvious. If you respond to the audience in that manner, it’s like telling them “SHUT UP!” and we’re taught from an early age that you shouldn’t do that. It’s simply rude. The audience has spontaneously combusted into a display of appreciation and you’ve just told them that you don’t care about that. This reaction also makes them verrrrry nervous to applaud for the rest of the performance. The audience is now more worried about when to applaud than listening and appreciating the performance.
The first reaction is okay but seems a little snobby to me. Ignoring the applause until you absolutely have to condescend to nod to them seems awkward and fake.
There is a better way!
Smile, nod. Maybe even mouth “thank you” and do a neck bow. Most importantly, do this once the audience starts clapping. It doesn’t need to be rushed (that also might be interpreted as “Shut up! I want to move on to the next movement!”) nor have any grandiose movements (after all, we don’t want them to think that this is the end of the whole darn thing!). It just needs to be a simple, genuine acknowledgement of their accolades.
BUT IT’S BETWEEN MOVEMENTS!! YOU’RE NOT SUPPOSED TO CLAP BETWEE…
Yeah yeah yeah, whatever. Not too long ago, audiences actually applauded between movements and it was okay!! Why can’t they do it anymore? Well, there is a valid argument for that. The composers wrote the multi-movement work to form a full piece. The single movement is only a portion. I can understand that viewpoint, but then again wouldn’t you want to know, as a composer, that a particular movement was so spectacular that the audience couldn’t help themselves? This is where I expect my composer brother, Brett Abigaña, to chime in with some choice composer words.
I’ll leave that argument for another time. Or for the comments section. I’ll also leave the post instructing audiences when they should applaud for another time. Suffice to say, that if the audience applauds between movements we performers should acknowledge it and graciously accept it. Not ignore it or make a rude attempt to shut it up.
Stay tuned for next week's entry, ACCOUTREMENTS, APPAREL AND ATTIRE, where I discuss what is and is not appropriate to wear for a performance.